Re: TSC elections format vote - please vote option 1, 2 or 3


Thanh ha
 

Option 2

With the current size of our community it makes sense to simplify our voting process so I think Option 2 makes a lot of sense for us.

Regards,
Thanh


On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 16:42, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitkoss@...> wrote:
Hi folks,

In the past I had created an email discussion about the TSC elections format:


Also we had discussed the topic on one of the TSC calls where the General consensus was that the TSC elections should be held October/November; all seats to be committer-at-large; reduced number of seats - please refer:


My action item was that I had to initiate an email vote regarding the format.

Hence I am starting a vote on the following question from the categories from that email first as the follow-on questions (number of seats, which categories for option 3) will become easier to frame based on the results on the categories.

So please vote on the following:

Which of the options for the representative group categories should be used for the TSC elections for the next term? Option 1 (status quo), Option 2 (effectively entire TSC committer-at-large seats) or Option 3 (hybrid of option 1 and 2 i.e. keep seats for some categories but make remaining seats committer-at-large)?

Options for Representative Group Categories:
  • Option 1: Keep the status quo i.e. categories are: Committer-at-large (CAL) and the PTLs for Kernel, Support, Protocol & Apps.
  • Option 2: Effectively make the entire TSC elected via committer-at-large seats. This would be done by increasing the number of seats of the committer-at-large and reduce all the other categories to have zero seats. One possible benefit for this is: this makes the elections very simple as there is only a single category. So adjusting the total number of seats would be very straightforward - just decide on number of total seats we want and the committer-at-large elections will have the same number of slots.
  • Option 3: Keep seats for only some categories with the remaining as committer-at-large: e.g. we might decide that kernel and support may be kept but not protocols and apps. If this option wins - we will need a follow-on vote regarding which categories.
Please vote only one of the three options - option 1, option 2 or option 3. It will be good to make this vote soon.

Thanks,
Abhijit

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11965): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/message/11965
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34303252/1869318
Group Owner: TSC+owner@...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/unsub  [zxiiro@...]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Join TSC@lists.opendaylight.org to automatically receive all group messages.